Ali bin Saeed Al-Kindi Al-Kufi told us, Ibn Abi Zaida told us, on the authority of Al-Hajjaj, on the authority of Zayd bin Jubayr, on the authority of Khashf bin Malik, he said I heard Ibn Masoud say that the Messenger of God, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, decided on the blood money for the sin of twenty girls of Makhad, twenty males of Banu Makhad, and twenty males. Bint Labun, twenty jadha’ahs, and twenty heqqahs. He said, and on the authority of Abdullah bin Amr. Abu Hisham Al-Rifai told us, Ibn Abi Zaydah and Abu Khaled Al-Ahmar told us on the authority of Al-Hajjaj ibn Artat, and something similar. Abu Issa said the hadith of Ibn Masoud does not We know him It is traced back to the Prophet except in this way, and it has been narrated on the authority of Abdullah as a chain of transmission. Some people of knowledge have gone to this, and it is a saying. Ahmed and Ishaq. The scholars have unanimously agreed that blood money is taken over three years, with each year a third of the blood money, and they saw that blood money Error on Aqila. Some of them believed that aqila is a man’s kinship through his father. This is the view of Malik and al-Shafi’i. Some of them said The blood money is due on men, not women and boys from the clan. Each man among them is charged a quarter of a dinar. Some of them said that Half a dinar, if the blood money is complete. Otherwise, the tribes closest to them will be looked at, and they will be obligated to do so.

Ahmad bin Saeed Al-Darimi told us, Hibban, who is Ibn Hilal, told us, Muhammad bin Rashid told us, Sulayman bin Musa told us, about Amr bin Shuaib, on the authority of his father, on the authority of his grandfather, that the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: “Whoever kills a believer intentionally will be delivered to the guardians of If they wish, they can kill the murdered person, and if they wish, they can take the blood money, which is thirty heqiqahs, thirty judahs, and forty caliphs, and whatever they reconcile over is For them. This is to strengthen the mind. Abu Issa said: The hadith of Abdullah bin Amr is a good and strange hadith.

Muhammad bin Bashar told us, Muadh bin Hani told us, Muhammad bin Muslim Al-Taifi told us, on the authority of Amr bin Dinar, on the authority of Ikrimah, on the authority of Ibn Abbas, on the authority of the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, that he set the blood money at twelve thousand.

Saeed bin Abdul Rahman Al Makhzoumi told us, Sufyan bin Uyaynah told us, on the authority of Amr bin Dinar, on the authority of Ikrimah, on the authority of the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace. Something similar, but it was not mentioned on the authority of Ibn Abbas, and in the hadith of Ibn Uyaynah there are more words than this. Abu Issa said, “We do not know of anyone.” In this hadith, it is mentioned on the authority of Ibn Abbas, other than Muhammad ibn Muslim. This hadith is acted upon according to some people of knowledge, and it is a statement. Ahmad and Ishaq. Some of the people of knowledge thought that the blood money was ten thousand, which is the saying of Sufyan al-Thawri and the people of Kufa. And he said. Al-Shafi’i I do not know of the blood money except from camels, which is one hundred camels or their value.

Humaid bin Masada told us, Yazid bin Zurayi told us, Husayn al-Mu’allim told us, on the authority of Amr bin Shuaib, on the authority of his father, on the authority of his grandfather, The Prophet, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, said, “There are five things in the cisterns.” Abu Issa said: This is a good hadith. This is acted upon according to the people of The knowledge is the saying of Sufyan Al-Thawri, Al-Shafi’i, Ahmad, and Ishaq, that there are five camels in the clearing.

Abu Ammar told us, Al-Fadl bin Musa told us, on the authority of Al-Hussein bin Waqid, on the authority of Yazid bin Amr Al-Nahwi, on the authority of Ikrimah, on the authority of Ibn Abbas, he said: The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said, “The blood money for the fingers and toes is equal to ten camels for each finger.” Abu said. Jesus, and on the authority of Abu Musa and Abdullah bin Amr. Abu Issa said: The hadith of Ibn Abbas is a good, authentic hadith, strange to this. The face. This is acted upon according to the people of knowledge, and this is what Sufyan, Al-Shafi’i, Ahmad, and Ishaq say.

Muhammad bin Bashar narrated to us, Yahya bin Sa’id narrated to us, and Muhammad bin Ja’far narrated to us, they said: Shu’bah narrated to us, on the authority of Qatada, on the authority of Ikrimah, on the authority of Ibn Abbas, on the authority of the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, said, “This one and that one are the same.” Meaning, the little finger and the thumb. Abu Issa said: This is a hadith. Good True.

Ahmad bin Muhammad narrated to us, Abdullah bin Al-Mubarak narrated to us, Yunus bin Abi Ishaq narrated to us, Abu Al-Safar narrated to us, he said: A man from The Quraysh sharpened the tooth of a man from the Ansar, and Muawiyah antagonized him, so he said to Muawiyah, O Commander of the Faithful, this man has broken my tooth. Muawiyah, we will satisfy you. The other insisted on Muawiyah, but he agreed to it, but he did not satisfy him. Muawiyah said to him, “How about your friend?” And Abu al-Darda’. Sitting with him, Abu Darda’ said: I heard the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, saying, “There is no man who is afflicted with anything in his body and gives it in charity.” Unless God raises him in status because of it and removes from him any sin because of it.” Al-Ansari said, “Did you hear it from the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace?” He said, “I heard it.” My ears and my heart were aware of him. He said, “I will leave it to him.” Mu’awiyah said, “No offense, I will not disappoint you.” So he ordered money for him. Abu Issa said. This is a strange hadith. We only know it from this perspective. I do not know that the father of the book heard anything from Abu al-Darda’, and the father of the book’s name is Sa’id ibn Ahmad, also called Ibn Ahmad Al-Thawri.

Ali bin Hajar narrated to us, Yazid bin Harun narrated to us, Hammam narrated to us, on the authority of Qatada, on the authority of Anas, he said, “A girl came out wearing scarves.” Then a Jew took her, smashed her head with a stone, and took the jewelry on her. He said, “Then she was brought to her senses, and there was blood on her, so she was brought to the Prophet, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him.” And peace be upon him He said, “The person who killed you was so-and-so.” She said, shaking her head, “No.” He said, “So-and-so,” until the Jew was named. She said, shaking her head. Yes, he said, so he was taken and confessed, so the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, ordered him to be buried between two stones. Abu Issa said: This is a good hadith. True. This is acted upon according to some people of knowledge, and it is the view of Ahmad and Ishaq. Some of the people of knowledge said: There is no fuel except by the sword.

Muhammad bin Bashar narrated to us, Muhammad bin Ja’far narrated to us, Shu’bah narrated to us, on the authority of Ya’la bin Ata’, on the authority of his father, on the authority of Abdullah bin Amr, similar to it but he did not narrate it. Abu Issa said, and this is more authentic than the hadith of Ibn Abi Adi. He said, and in the chapter on the authority of Saad and Ibn, Abbas and my father Saeed, Abu Hurairah, Uqba bin Amir, Ibn Masoud, and Buraydah. Abu Issa said the hadith of Abdullah bin Amr, this is how he narrated it. Ibn Abi Adi, on the authority of Shu’bah, on the authority of Ali bin Ata’, on the authority of his father, on the authority of Abdullah bin Amr, on the authority of the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace. And Muhammad bin Jafar, And more than one, on the authority of Shu’bah, on the authority of Ya’la bin Ata, but he did not narrate it. And thus Sufyan al-Thawri narrated, on the authority of Ya’la bin Ata, with a chain of transmission. This is more correct than the raised hadith.

Mahmoud bin Ghaylan narrated to us, Wahb bin Jarir narrated to us, Shu’bah narrated to us, on the authority of Al-A’mash, on the authority of Abu Wa’il, on the authority of Abdullah, he said: The Messenger of God said: God, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, “The first thing to be judged between servants is blood.” Abu Issa said, “The hadith of Abdullah is a good and authentic hadith.” Thus, more than one person narrated it on the authority of Al-A’mash, with a chain of transmission traceable to the Prophet, and some of them narrated it on the authority of Al-Amash, but they did not narrate it as a chain of transmission.

Abu Kurayb told us, Waki’ told us, on the authority of Al-Amash, on the authority of Abu Wa’il, on the authority of Abdullah, he said: The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: “The first thing to be decided between the servants is bloodshed.”

Al-Hussein bin Harith narrated to us, Al-Fadl bin Musa narrated to us, on the authority of Al-Hussein bin Waqid, on the authority of Yazid Al-Raqashi, Abu Al-Hakam Al-Bajli narrated to us, he said I heard Abu Sa`id al-Khudri and Abu Hurairah mentioning on the authority of the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, who said, “If only the people of heaven And the people of the earth share in the blood of a believer, God will cast them into Hell.” Abu Issa said: This is a strange hadith. And Abu Al-Hakam Al-Bajli He is Abd al-Rahman bin Abi Naam al-Kufi.

Ali bin Hajar narrated to us, Ismail bin Ayyash narrated to us, Al-Muthanna bin Al-Sabbah narrated to us, on the authority of Amr bin Shuaib, on the authority of his father, on the authority of his grandfather, On the authority of Suraqa bin Malik bin Jasham, he said, “I was present with the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, in the presence of the father from his son but not the son from his father.” He said Abu Issa, this is a hadith that we do not know of the hadith of Suraqah except through this route, and its chain of transmission is not authentic. It was narrated by Ismail bin Ayyash on the authority of Al-Muthanna bin Al-Sabbah. Al-Muthanna bin Al-Sabbah is weakened in the hadith. This hadith was narrated by Abu Khaled Al-Ahmar on the authority of Al-Hajjaj bin Artah, on the authority of Amr bin Shuaib, on the authority of his father, on the authority of his grandfather, on the authority of Omar, on the authority of the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace. This hadith was narrated on the authority of Amr bin Shuaib, on the authority of This is a hadith that contains confusion. The work on this according to the people of knowledge is that if a father kills his son, he will not be killed for him, and if he slanders his son Unlimited...

Abu Sa`id al-Ashjaj told us, al-Ahmar told us, on the authority of al-Hajjaj ibn Artat, on the authority of Amr ibn Shuaib, on the authority of his father, on the authority of his grandfather, on the authority of Umar ibn Al-Khattab said: I heard the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, saying: “The father is not led by the child.”

Muhammad bin Bashar told us, Ibn Abi Adi told us, on the authority of Ismail bin Muslim, on the authority of Amr bin Dinar, on the authority of Tawus, on the authority of Ibn Abbas, On the authority of the Prophet, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, he said: “Punishment punishments shall not be imposed in mosques, and the father shall not be killed for the child.” Abu Issa said: This hadith is not We know of it with this chain of transmission that is traced back to the Prophet except from the hadith of Ismail bin Muslim. Some of the people of Ismail bin Muslim Al-Makki spoke about it. Knowledge by preserving it

Hanad told us, Abu Muawiyah told us, on the authority of Al-Amash, on the authority of Abdullah bin Murrah, on the authority of Masruq, on the authority of Abdullah bin Masoud, he said, he said The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, “It is not permissible to shed the blood of a Muslim man who bears witness that there is no god but God and that I am the Messenger of God except by one of three The married adulterer, a life for a life, the one who abandons his religion and separates from the community.” He said, and in the chapter on the authority of Uthman, Aisha, and Ibn Abbas. Abu Issa said the hadith of Ibn Masoud is a hasan and authentic hadith.

Muhammad bin Bashar narrated to us, Maadi bin Sulaiman, he is Al-Basri, narrated to us, on the authority of Ibn Ajlan, on the authority of his father, on the authority of Abu Hurairah, on the authority of the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace. And he said: “Whoever kills a soul by making a treaty under the protection of God and the protection of His Messenger for him, has disgraced himself under the protection of God and does not smell the scent.” Paradise, and indeed its fragrance is felt from the distance of seventy autumns.” He said, and in the chapter on the authority of Abu Bakra. Abu Issa said the hadith of Abu Hurairah A good and authentic hadith that was narrated through more than one authority, on the authority of Abu Hurairah, on the authority of the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace.

Abu Kurayb told us, Yahya bin Adam told us, on the authority of Abu Bakr bin Ayyash, on the authority of Abu Saad, on the authority of Ikrimah, on the authority of Ibn Abbas, that The Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, paid blood money to the Amirites as a ransom for the Muslims, and they had a covenant from the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace. Abu Issa said this hadith. He is a stranger and we do not know him except from this aspect. Abu Saad the grocer’s name is Sa’id ibn al-Marzban.

Mahmoud bin Ghaylan and Yahya bin Musa told us, they said: Al-Walid bin Muslim told us, Al-Awza’i told us, Yahya bin Abi Kathir told me, Abu Salamah told me, Abu Hurairah told me, he said, when God conquered Mecca for His Messenger, he stood up among the people and thanked God and praised him. Then he said, “And whoever has someone killed, he has the choice of two options: either to pardon or to be killed.” He said, in the chapter on Wael bin Hajr, Anas, Abu Shuraih, Khuwaylid bin Amr.

Muhammad bin Bashar narrated to us, Yahya bin Saeed narrated to us, Ibn Abi Dhib narrated to us, Saeed bin Abi Saeed Al-Maqbari narrated to me, on the authority of my father Shurayh Al-Kaabi, that the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said, “God has made Mecca sacred, but the people have not made it sacred, whoever believes in God.” And on the Last Day, they shall not shed blood therein, nor shall they uphold trees therein. But if a concessioner makes a concession, he says, “It is lawful for the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace.” God made it lawful for me and did not make it lawful for people. Rather, it was made lawful for me for an hour of the day, then it is forbidden until the Day of Resurrection, then You, O people of Khuza'ah, killed this man from Hudhayl, and I am responsible for him. So whoever has someone killed after today, his family is between two choices. Either they kill or take the mind.” Abu Issa said: This is a good and authentic hadith. And the hadith of Abu Hurairah is a good and authentic hadith. And he narrated it Shayban also reported on the authority of Yahya ibn Abi Kathir like this. If someone is killed, he has the right to kill, pardon, or take the blood money.” Some people of knowledge held this view, and this is the view of Ahmad. And Isaac...

Abu Kurayb told us, Abu Muawiyah told us, on the authority of Al-Amash, on the authority of Abu Salih, on the authority of Abu Hurairah, he said: A man was killed during the reign of the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace. He greeted him, so the killer was given to his guardian, and the killer said, “O Messenger of God, by God, I did not want to kill him.” So the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said He said: “But if he is truthful and you kill him, you will enter Hell.” Then the man left him. He said, and he was wearing a scarf. He said, so he left. He drags his saddlebag. He said, he was called Dhul-Nasa’ah. Abu Issa said: This is a good and authentic hadith. And the saddlebag is a rope.

Muhammad bin Bashar told us, Abd al-Rahman bin Mahdi told us, Sufyan told us, on the authority of Alqamah bin Marthad, on the authority of Sulayman bin Buraidah, on the authority of His father, he said, whenever the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, sent a commander to command an army, he would instruct him privately to fear God and those with him. He treated the Muslims well, and he said, “Fight in the name of God and in the path of God. Fight those who disbelieve in God. Fight, and do not exaggerate, do not deceive, do not mutilate, and do not “You kill a child.” And in the hadith there is a story. He said, and on the subject, on the authority of Abdullah bin Masoud, Shaddad bin Aws, and Imran bin Husayn, Anas, Samra, Al-Mughirah, Ali bin Murrah, and Abu Ayyub. Abu Issa said the hadith of Buraydah is a good and authentic hadith. He disliked it. Ideal people of knowledge

Ahmad bin Mani’ told us, Hushaym told us, Khaled told us, on the authority of Abu Qilaba, on the authority of Abu Al-Ash’ath Al-San’ani, on the authority of Shaddad bin Aws, that The Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, said, “Indeed, God has ordained goodness upon all things, so when you kill, kill well, and when you slaughter So slaughter well, and let each one of you sharpen his blade and let his sacrifice be cleansed.” He said: This is a good and authentic hadith. Abu Al-Ash’ath Al-San’ani His name is Shurahbil bin Adah

Ali bin Saeed Al-Kindi Al-Kufi told us, Ibn Abi Zaida told us, on the authority of Muhammad bin Amr, on the authority of Abu Salamah, on the authority of Abu Hurairah, he said The Messenger of God, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, made a ruling regarding the fetus with the forelock of a male or female slave. The one on whom the ruling was made said, “Should we give one who neither drinks nor eats nor He shouted and began, and something similar to that appears. The Prophet, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, said, “Indeed, this is spoken by a poet, but there is in it the temptation of a male or female slave.” On the authority of Hamal bin Malik bin Al-Nabigha and Al-Mughirah bin Shu’bah. Abu Issa said the hadith of Abu Hurairah is a good and authentic hadith. This is according to the people of knowledge. Some of them said: A foreign man is a male or female slave or five hundred dirhams. And some of them said or A horse or a mule...

Al-Hasan bin Ali Al-Khalal narrated to us, Wahb bin Jarir narrated to us, Shu’bah narrated to us, on the authority of Mansour, on the authority of Ibrahim, on the authority of Ubaid bin Nadlah, On the authority of Al-Mughirah bin Shu’bah, that two women who were co-wives threw a stone or a tent at the other, causing her to lose her fetus. So the Messenger of God, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, decreed that the fetus should be the forelock of a male or female slave and placed it on the woman’s side. Al-Hasan said, and Zayd ibn Zayd informed us. Hubab, on the authority of Sufyan, on the authority of Mansour, with this hadith and something like it. This is a good and authentic hadith.

Ahmad bin Mani’ told us, Hushaym told us, Mutarrif told us, on the authority of Al-Sha’bi, Abu Juhayfa told us, he said, I said to Ali, O Commander of the Faithful Do you have black and white? It is not in the Book of God. He said, No. By the one who split the grain and healed the breath, I have not known him except understanding. God will give him a man in the Qur’an and what is in the scroll. I said, and what is in the scroll, he said, “In it is reason and the redemption of a prisoner, and that a believer should not be killed for an unbeliever.” He said, and on the authority of Abdullah bin Amr. Abu Issa said: The hadith of Ali is a good and authentic hadith. This should be acted upon when Some people of knowledge, and this is the opinion of Sufyan al-Thawri, Malik ibn Anas, al-Shafi’i, Ahmad, and Ishaq, said that a believer should not be killed for an unbeliever. Some people of knowledge said that a Muslim should be killed for making treaties. The first saying is more correct.

Issa bin Ahmad narrated to us, Ibn Wahb narrated to us, on the authority of Usama bin Zayd, on the authority of Amr bin Shuaib, on the authority of his father, on the authority of his grandfather, that the Messenger of God May God’s prayers and peace be upon him. He said, “A Muslim shall not be killed for an infidel.” With this chain of transmission, on the authority of the Prophet, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, he said, “The blood money for the infidel’s mind is half the blood money.” The mind of the believer. Abu Issa said that the hadith of Abdullah bin Amr on this subject is a good hadith. The scholars differed regarding the blood money. The Jew and the Christian. Some of the people of knowledge regarding the blood money for the Jew and the Christian went to what was narrated on the authority of the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace. He said: Omar bin Abdul Aziz: The blood money for a Jew and a Christian is half the blood money for a Muslim. This is what Ahmad bin Hanbal says, and it was narrated on the authority of Omar bin Al-Khattab said that the blood money for a Jew and a Christian is four thousand dirhams, and the blood money for a Magi is eight hundred dirhams. And with this he says Malik bin Anas, Al-Shafi’i, and Ishaq. Some scholars said that the blood money of a Jew and a Christian is the same as the blood money of a Muslim. It is The saying of Sufyan Al-Thawri and the people of Kufa.

Qutaibah narrated to us, Abu Awanah narrated to us, on the authority of Qatada, on the authority of Al-Hasan, on the authority of Samurah, he said: The Messenger of God, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, said: “Whoever kills his servant We killed him, and whoever harms his servant, We kill him.” Abu Issa said, “This is a hasan ghareeb hadith, and some of the scholars among the followers have said Among them is Ibrahim Al-Nakha'i and some of the scholars, including Al-Hasan Al-Basri and Ata' bin Abi Rabah, said: There is no difference between a free man and a slave. Retaliation for the soul or for anything other than the soul. This is the statement of Ahmad and Ishaq. Some of them said: If he kills his servant, he will not be killed for it. If a slave kills another, he will be killed for him. This is the view of Sufyan Al-Thawri and the people of Kufa.

Qutaybah, Ahmad bin Mani’, Abu Ammar and more than one person narrated to us. They said: Sufyan bin Uyaynah narrated to us, on the authority of Al-Zuhri, on the authority of Sa’id bin Al-Musayyab, that Omar used to say that the blood-money is due on the free woman, and the woman does not inherit anything from her husband’s blood-money. Until Al-Dahhak ibn Al-Dahhak told him Sufyan Al-Kalabi reported that the Messenger of God, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, wrote to him “to inherit the wife of Ashim Al-Dhababi from her husband’s blood money.” Abu said. Jesus, this is a good and authentic hadith. This is acted upon according to the people of knowledge.

Ali bin Khashram told us, Issa bin Yunus told us, on the authority of Shu’bah, on the authority of Qatada, he said, I heard Zurara bin Awfa, speaking on the authority of Imran Ibn Husayn said that a man bit another man’s hand, so he pulled his hand off and his folds fell off. They disputed with the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, and he said, “One of you will bite.” “His brother, just as a stallion bites, there is no blood money for you.” Then God revealed (and wounds are retaliation). He said, and on the authority of Ya’la bin Umayyah. And Salama bin Umayyah, and they are brothers. Abu Issa said: The hadith of Imran bin Husayn is a good and authentic hadith.

Ali bin Saeed Al-Kindi told us, Ibn Al-Mubarak told us, on the authority of Muammar, on the authority of Bahz bin Hakim, on the authority of his father, on the authority of his grandfather, that the Prophet, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him He said: He imprisoned a man on an accusation, then released him. He said: And in the chapter on the authority of Abu Hurairah. Abu Issa said: Hadith of Bahz, on the authority of his father, on the authority of His grandfather is a good hadith. Ismail bin Ibrahim narrated on the authority of Bahz bin Hakim. This hadith is more complete than this and longer.

Salama bin Shabib, Hatim bin Siyah Al-Maruzi, and more than one person narrated to us. They said: Abd al-Razzaq narrated to us, on the authority of Muammar, on the authority of Al-Zuhri, on the authority of Talha bin Abdullah bin Awf, on the authority of Abdul Rahman bin Amr bin Sahl, on the authority of Saeed bin Zaid bin Amr bin Nufayl, on the authority of the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him God, peace and blessings be upon him, said: “Whoever is killed while defending his property is a martyr, and whoever steals a span of land will be surrounded on the Day of Resurrection by seven lands.” He added. Hatem bin Siyah Al-Maruzi in this hadith, Muammar said: I was informed on the authority of Al-Zuhri, but I did not hear from him. He added in this hadith: “Whoever was killed Regardless of his wealth, he is a martyr.” And thus Shuaib bin Abi Hamza narrated this hadith on the authority of Al-Zuhri, on the authority of Talha bin Abdullah, on the authority of Abd al-Rahman bin Amr bin Sahl, on the authority of Sa`id bin Zayd, on the authority of the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace. Sufyan bin Uyaynah narrated on the authority of al-Zuhri, on the authority of Talha bin Abdullah, on the authority of Saeed bin Zaid, on the authority of the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, and Sufyan was not mentioned in it, on the authority of Abdul Rahman bin Amr bin Sahl. And this is a hadith. Good and true...

Muhammad bin Bashar told us, Abu Amir Al-Aqdi told us, Abdul Aziz bin Al-Muttalib told us, on the authority of Abdullah bin Al-Hasan, on the authority of Ibrahim Bin Muhammad bin Talha, on the authority of Abdullah bin Amr, on the authority of the Prophet, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, who said: “Whoever is killed while protecting his wealth is a martyr.” He said, on the authority of Ali, Sa`id bin Zaid, Abu Hurairah, Ibn Umar, Ibn Abbas, and Jabir. Abu Issa said the hadith of Abdullah bin Amr is a hasan hadith, and it was narrated from him through more than one authority. Some people of knowledge have permitted a man to fight for himself and his money. And he said Ibn Al-Mubarak fights for his money, even if it is two dirhams.

Muhammad bin Bashar told us, Abdul Rahman bin Mahdi told us, Sufyan told us, on the authority of Abdullah bin Al-Hassan, on the authority of Ibrahim bin Muhammad Ibn Talha, on the authority of Abdullah Ibn Amr, on the authority of the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, and something similar.

Abd bin Humaid told us, he said: Yaqoub bin Ibrahim bin Saad told me, my father told us, on the authority of his father, on the authority of Abu Ubaidah bin Muhammad bin Ammar bin Yasser, on the authority of Talha bin Abdullah bin Awf, on the authority of Saeed bin Zaid, said: I heard the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, saying, “Whoever was killed Whoever protects his wealth is a martyr, and whoever is killed in defense of his religion is a martyr, and whoever is killed in defense of his blood is a martyr, and whoever is killed in defense of his family is a martyr. A martyr. He said this is a good hadith. And so more than one person narrated something like this on the authority of Ibrahim bin Saad. And Jacob is the son of Ibrahim bin Saad bin Ibrahim bin Abdul Rahman bin Awf Al-Zuhri.

Qutaibah narrated to us, Al-Layth bin Saad narrated to us, on the authority of Yahya bin Saeed, on the authority of Bashir bin Yasar, on the authority of Sahl bin Abi Hathamah, Yahya said And I counted on the authority of Rafi’ ibn Khadij that they said: Abdullah ibn Sahl ibn Zayd and Muhayyisah ibn Masoud ibn Zayd went out even when they were In Khaybar They dispersed for some time there, and then Muhayyisa found Abdullah bin Sahl dead. He buried him, then he went to the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace. He, Huwayysa bin Masoud, and Abd al-Rahman bin Sahl, and he was the youngest of the people. Abd al-Rahman went to speak before his two companions. The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said to him, “Be proud.” He remained silent and his two companions spoke. Then he spoke to them and they mentioned to the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, that he had been killed. Abdullah bin Sahl said to them, “Will you swear fifty oaths and then you will be worthy of your companion or your killer?” They said. And how can we swear when we do not bear witness? He said, “Then the Jews will acquit you with fifty oaths.” They said, “How can we accept the oaths of an infidel people?” When he saw That is the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, he gave his mind. Al-Hasan bin Ali Al-Khallal told us, Yazid bin Harun told us, Yahya bin Saeed, on the authority of Bashir bin Yassar, on the authority of Sahl bin Abi Hathamah, and Rafi’ bin Khadij, similar to this hadith in its meaning. Abu Issa said This is a hasan and authentic hadith. This hadith is acted upon according to the people of knowledge regarding division, and some of the jurists of Medina considered it permissible. By oath... Some of the scholars from the people of Kufa and others said that the division does not necessitate a sacrifice, but rather it necessitates blood money. The last chapters on blood money. And praise be to God.